卢亦岑 辽宁省沈阳市东北育才学校 Today, more and more students choose to go to universities after their (they) graduate from high school. The motive varies from individual to individual. Meanwhile, there are also a number of people argue that for juveniles, taking correspondence courses or going to evening classes and open universities in their spare time would be a better choice, since these students, who are new-comers of the society, can learn much more outside the classroom. To determine which is more desirable, we should look into further details. It is a simple yet universial (universal) law that for adolescents, study is a never-changed thing to do. Consequently, students may never take the pain to ponder: why I go to school? When answering the question why they go to universities, they may say, “to learn more academic knowledges (knowledge), to made new friends, to look for a higher-paid (well-paid) job and so on.” Universities, nevertheless, have the ability to offer young peoples (people) who are of an age a large platform, which let them to meet, to compete, and to learn from each other. The impact that universities have had on our society in general, is undeniable. Lots of people when reminded (recalling) of the old days in university, would say, that four years are golden, since (for) it provided them lots of opportunities. Though painstaking and time-consuming in many people’s eye, the function that university as a refinery of the young is highly valued and of essence. On the contrary, evening classes and so on, would stand in a lower position for its lack of communications. Say, students come from a single (the same) city, not even a country. Unlike the exotic faces in a university , students of a (an) evening class are not at all diversified. In addition, it is no doubt that in a broad sense, no one can garantee (guarantee) that those student (students) will be under a condition of “learning” during the free time of a part time (parttime) class. Will all of them, our future elites, go to work or read books in libraries? Hardly. Gone are the days when knowledge is highly valued. It is a time now, when technology is accumulated by multiplying, and at the same time becomes more and more entertaining. Internet, TV, … all kinds of things will lead to a consequence that students’ concentration be distracted. As a result, the detriments of evening class will overweigh its benifits (benefits). When the issue comes to my current situation, I will definetly (definitely) choose go to universities without any hesitate (hesitation). However, part-time classes would be a better choice under only one circumstance. It only benefits people who have high self-control, who are virtually minority in quantity.
Uncategorized
Background on Southeast Asian Parenting In order to understand the parenting styles of South Asian parents, we...
Great power of China Vinh Le Great power of China
God is a mad –a book review for Steve Jobs The people who are crazy...
马云丽 河北省冀州市午村中学 How time flies!My colorful junior middle school life is coming to an end. I’m...
姓名：姬潇依 那是一个大师的时代，知识之光照亮黑暗迷途，学术之风吹散蒙昧迷障。静默鸿蒙，蔡元培先生的一句“思想自由”今犹铿锵在耳；参透尘世，胡适新文化的呐喊摇撼天地。如今的社会，利益与无知如同叠嶂苍烟，唯有拨云见日，踏破如许苍烟，才能还学术清净，还学问单纯。 从前，德之教化如清流荡涤灵魂，犹记冯友兰先生在《西南联大纪念碑碑文》有言：“小德川流，大德敦化。”蔡元培先生以“学界泰斗，人世楷模”的德行感染了一代又一代的青年学子。人格之高尚，德育之先锋，大师提供着学术坐标，更树立了风骨之碑。 如今，德却退化成那华丽飞檐上最不起眼的笔画。从何时开始，次道德变得理所当然？伪道德变得肆虐猖狂？狷介之人纵然力挽狂澜，却无法在社会的一潭死水中激起波浪。德的教化，一点点被唯利是图的观念蚕食鲸吞。这其中，网络之力不可忽视。网络媒体宣扬着伟大的美德，却只会收到子贡赎人的负面效果。郭明义、陈树菊固然值得尊敬，但普通人的道德之举同样值得称颂。对于不可为的道德过分赞颂，网络无形之中提高了社会的道德底线，将其升至无人匹及的高度。当道德不再是行为准则，而变得曲高和寡，全社会都会消极避让，又谈何川流、敦化？唯有踏破眼前对德的畸形视角，一个大国方能精神富有。 从前，责之宣扬浸染学术气息。黄炎培先生有言：“利居众后，责在人先。”他道尽了一位知识分子的做人之法。蔡元培先生亦是奉命于危难之间，先义后利，承担起一校之长的重任。也正是蔡先生奉行着责任，学术之风才吹遍大江南北，学问之术才传至东西。 如今，责在利的面前变得无足轻重。古人有言：“正其谊而不谋其利，明其道而不计其功。”可是这种道德理想已然消逝，随之而来的是冰封的社会奉献精神、烈炙的人际交往关系。归真堂放弃生命责任，在熊胆之利面前颔首，这难道不是利之戕害吗？媒体鼓吹着社会责任感，然而唯利是图的物质环境又如何不会导致唯利是图的精神底色？中国是世界第二大奢侈品消费国，足可见得物化资本对国民的诱惑力，在精神逐渐丧失的社会，责任才是王道。物质追求，便是那封在眼前的袅袅炊烟，不，是滚滚浓烟，荼毒着人们的身心。这道烟屏，已然挡住了无数人，他们迷失在自我构筑的纸醉金迷的世界里，无法自拔。而责任，则是如注的雨水，洗刷整个世界，冲走物欲之烟。从利在人先向利居众后的转化，是公民意识的觉醒；从责居众后向责在人先的变革，则是一个民族的精神重生。 从前，真乃学术之要义。蔡元培先生一句“兼容并包”开启了追求真理的大门，开学术之风气，领万古之先锋。古人夜观星象，欲从星座递嬗中找寻自然的真理；近人纳古今东西之精粹，亦想从中找出社会的真理。做学问，正如朱光潜先生之言，要用出世之精神。何谓出世？寻真理也。 如今，真知成为名誉的附庸，成为虚伪的阶下囚。《大学》之中所谓先“格物致知”获得真理，才能“修身齐家治国”，终能“平天下”。犹记前一阵子的方韩之战，一方坚定不移地紧握证据，一方竭力捍卫清白之名。然而方舟子的真理之辩终于抵住了流言，亦开启了信息时代的新一轮真理大讨论。如今的媒体亦是走向浮夸，抛却真理。断章取义，散布谣言，借助网络之力蒙蔽大众之眼。这置真理于何处？耸人听闻的内容不过是赚人眼球的噱头，夸张尖锐的语言也不堪一击。名誉、声望不过是过眼云烟，真理却是脚下顽石，经得起千锤百炼。 不如把学问比作沙滩上的一次漫步吧。海是钢蓝的凉，日是萤红的温，沙是亮白的软。你听着涛声，在沙滩上画下思绪，一浪倾覆；你望着远方，在风中喊出内心的愁怨，又一浪吞噬。篝火的烟尘弥漫，眼前如雪中观鹤的一片白，倏忽间前路迷散，不见天日。向前走，还是留？篝火中芳香的烧烤蕴在烟中诱惑着你，然而前路的风景尚未领悟。贝壳划破了脚，浓烟呛出眼泪，可是苍烟之后，竟是最美的日落。云谲波诡，气象万千，红日炼金，天海一色。 踏破苍烟，追寻大师的足迹，在那峥嵘岁月中重温元培的胸襟、适之的眼光；踏破苍烟，更是对现代社会种种诟病的真知灼见，认清本质从而坚守理想。 在当今社会，若想内圣而外王，须得拨云见日，于内心不为外物所动，于外在不因主观而枉。这个世界烟雾重重，如攀高山，但只有不断地踏破苍烟，才有可能达到顶峰。 苍烟踏破，方可避“削足适履”“饮鸩止渴”，立天地之心，化万物于无形，用德行引领行动，用责任树立人格，用真理指导风尚。 心如明镜台，又惮苍烟于何处？ http://pic23.nipic.com/20120918/4550639_164512371132_2.jpg
Mizuki Hashimoto Otsuma Ranzan Junior High School The environmental issue that worries me most is greenhouse...